1954 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,136 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1954 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1954 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 170 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Humber Super Snipe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Humber Super Snipe | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Humber | Toyota |
Model | Super Snipe | Tundra |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4136 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3270 mm |