1954 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,136 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1954 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1954 Humber Super Snipe.
Because 1954 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Humber Super Snipe | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Humber | Ford |
Model | Super Snipe | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4136 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2490 mm |