1954 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,136 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1954 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1954 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 110 kg more than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Humber Super Snipe | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Humber | Toyota |
Model | Super Snipe | Tundra |
Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4136 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |