1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 1967 Mini MK I
To start off, 1967 Mini MK I is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Isuzu Minx (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 345 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 1967 Mini MK I | |
Make | Isuzu | Mini |
Model | Minx | MK I |
Year Released | 1954 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2040 mm |