1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 210 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Isuzu | Zastava |
Model | Minx | 102 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2160 mm |