1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 1992 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1992 Maserati Shamal is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Maserati Shamal (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Maserati Shamal weights approximately 360 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Isuzu Minx | 1992 Maserati Shamal | |
| Make | Isuzu | Maserati |
| Model | Minx | Shamal |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 3217 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2520 mm |
