1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,423 cc, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 15 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Isuzu Minx | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
| Model | Minx | Polo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1423 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 945 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2410 mm |
