1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Isuzu Minx | 2008 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
| Model | Minx | Eos |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2580 mm |
