1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 5 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | 6 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2800 mm |