1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 5 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Isuzu Minx | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Minx | 6 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2610 mm |
