1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 1954 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1954 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Isuzu Minx | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Minx | ML |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2920 mm |
