1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 20 kg more than 2010 Ford Ka.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Isuzu | Ford |
Model | Minx | Ka |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2310 mm |