1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 487 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Isuzu Minx | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Isuzu | Ford |
| Model | Minx | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1447 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3193 mm |
