1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,598 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W (247 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W has automatic transmission and 1954 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1954 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Isuzu | SsangYong |
Model | Minx | Chairman W |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2970 mm |