1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 510 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Isuzu | Suzuki |
Model | Minx | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |