1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1954 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1954 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Isuzu | Holden |
Model | Minx | Epica |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |