1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 519 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 955 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
Model | Minx | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2880 mm |