1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 958 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Isuzu Minx | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | Minx | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1918 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2774 mm |
