1954 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Proton Juara
To start off, 2002 Proton Juara is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Proton Juara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jaguar XK | 2002 Proton Juara | |
Make | Jaguar | Proton |
Model | XK | Juara |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1094 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2400 mm |