1954 Jaguar XK vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jaguar XK | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | Tribute |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |