1954 Jaguar XK vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jaguar XK | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | Tribute |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |