1954 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jaguar XK | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | XK | LR2 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2180 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |