1954 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1422 kg more than 1954 Jaguar XK.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jaguar XK | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | XK | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3628 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 640 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2717 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 105 L |