1954 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Jaguar XK | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | XK | Juke |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4125 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2530 mm |
