1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 600 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Jeep CJ | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ | Elan |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1968 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2240 mm |
