1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1968 Marcos 1600
To start off, 1968 Marcos 1600 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Marcos 1600 (88 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Marcos 1600 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 268 kg more than 1968 Marcos 1600.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Marcos 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Marcos 1600. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Marcos 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 1968 Marcos 1600 | |
Make | Jeep | Marcos |
Model | CJ | 1600 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 762 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2270 mm |