1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1970 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1970 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1970 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 70 kg more than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1970 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 1970 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2480 mm |