1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Galant

To start off, 1973 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mitsubishi Galant (74 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Galant should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 240 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Galant.

Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Galant. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Galant.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Jeep CJ 1973 Mitsubishi Galant
Make Jeep Mitsubishi
Model CJ Galant
Year Released 1954 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3151 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 62 HP 74 HP
Torque 179 Nm 116 Nm
Torque RPM 1350 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 940 kg
Vehicle Length 3520 mm 4210 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1610 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2430 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]