1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Jeep CJ (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66. 1976 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1954 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1954 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ | 66 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |