1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1982 Seat Ronda is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (61 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 130 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Seat Ronda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Jeep | Seat |
Model | CJ | Ronda |
Year Released | 1954 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2460 mm |