1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1983 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1983 Lancia Beta is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Jeep CJ (136 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1983 Lancia Beta. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1983 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lancia Beta weights approximately 15 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Lancia Beta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Beta. (207 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 1983 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Jeep | Lancia |
Model | CJ | Beta |
Year Released | 1954 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2560 mm |