1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1989 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1989 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 62 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 330 kg more than 1989 Skoda Rapid R.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Skoda Rapid R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 1989 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Jeep | Skoda |
Model | CJ | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1954 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3151 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 2850 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2410 mm |