1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 70 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1954 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |