1954 Jeep CJ vs. 1997 Rover 200
To start off, 1997 Rover 200 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Rover 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 200. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 1997 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | CJ | 200 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |