1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 505 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus M250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | CJ | M250 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3151 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2520 mm |