1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2002 Lada Samara II
To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lada Samara II (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lada Samara II should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 210 kg more than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Lada Samara II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada Samara II. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2002 Lada Samara II | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | CJ | Samara II |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3151 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2470 mm |