1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Proton 400.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Proton 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | CJ | 400 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3151 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |