1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (114 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 602 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ | Condor |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1632 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |