1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 193 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (184 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | 3 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1223 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |