1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Peugeot 207 (88 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Peugeot 207. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
Model | CJ | 207 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |