1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2008 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2008 Nissan 350Z is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan 350Z (306 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (136 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 68 kg more than 2008 Nissan 350Z.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Nissan 350Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan 350Z (363 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2008 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ | 350Z |
Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 363 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |