1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Cube. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 1954 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1954 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ | Cube |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3151 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |