1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ | Megane |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3151 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |