1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2009 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2009 Renault Symbol is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Symbol (74 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 180 kg more than 2009 Renault Symbol.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Symbol. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Symbol. (105 Nm). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2009 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ | Symbol |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3151 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 105 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2473 mm |