1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (136 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 420 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. (232 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Jeep CJ | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
| Model | CJ | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 136 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |
