1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Jeep CJ | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3151 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1341 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |
