1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 207 (74 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 106 kg more than 2010 Peugeot 207.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Peugeot 207. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 207. (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Jeep CJ | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
| Model | CJ | 207 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3151 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1074 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2550 mm |
