1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi TT (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi TT weights approximately 440 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi TT (349 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2011 Audi TT | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | CJ | TT |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2469 mm |