1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (136 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Jeep Compass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2011 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Jeep | Jeep |
Model | CJ | Compass |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2634 mm |