1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Opel Combo
To start off, 2011 Opel Combo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Opel Combo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2011 Opel Combo | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | CJ | Combo |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2720 mm |